We all have reputations that we're concerned about. If that is your bread and butter, if that is your sole business, you can certainly understand how these allegations could harm their reputation. The plaintiff here certainly has a legitimate argument to make that its business was being impuned with allegations of election fraud. "This case has implications for all the parties involved. He says any outcome in the case may have major effects. Roy Gutterman is a communications law expert and associate professor at Syracuse University. He questioned the Fox legal team about its argument of ‘neutral reporting’ privilege, where they say the network aired former President Donald Trump’s claims about the 2020 election in pursuit of ratings. Davis said in a Delaware hearing that he was still deciding whether or not to issue a summary judgment. The company alleges Fox ruined its reputation as an election tech provider by knowingly airing vote-rigging claims that the network knew were false. It’s one of the most closely watched media trials in years.Īnd both sides had been hoping for a quick ruling without a jury over Dominion’s $1.6 billion lawsuit. network tried to avoid the defamation trial it faces from Dominion Voting Systems. STORY: Fox News was met with a skeptical judge Tuesday as the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |